The Present King of England, Scotland and Ireland
The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://haquelebac.wordpress.com/2010/05/10/the-present-king-of-scotland-and-ireland/trackback/
The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://haquelebac.wordpress.com/2010/05/10/the-present-king-of-scotland-and-ireland/trackback/
"Les Trophees", Jose-Maria de Heredia
"Sentimental Education", Gustave Flaubert
"Complete Works", Nathanael West
"These United States", Daniel Borus, ed.
"Buvard and Pecuchet," Gustave Flaubert
"An Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese", Axel Schuessler
"Patriotic Gore", Edmund Wilson
"Personal Memoirs", Ulysses S. Grant
“The Autobiography of Mark Twain” (2010)
“Mark Twain and the Three R's”, Maxwell Geismar
“Nomads and Ottomans in Medieval Anatolia”, Rudi Lindner
“The Symposium”, Plato (tr. Hamilton)
“Cod”, Mark Kurlansky
“Zombie Economics”, John Quiggin
“Dubliners”, James Joyce
“The Art of War”, Sun-Tzu (tr. Minford)
“The French Parnassian Poets”, Robert Denommėe
"Chinggis Khan", Ruth Dunnell
"Queen of Populists", Richard Stiller
"Gustave Courbet", Gerstle Mack
"Ubu Roi", Alfred Jarry
"Boy Life on the Prairie", Hamlin Garland
"Gerard de Nerval", ed. Jean Richer
"A Chinese Reading of the Daodejing", Rudolf Wagner
"Studs Lonigan, James T. Farrell
"Antologia Poetica", Carlos Drummond de Andrade
"Selected Poems", Jules Supervielle
"Amulet", Carl Rakosi
"Memoirs of a Breton Peasant", deGuignet, Jean-Marie
"The Original Tao", Harold Roth
"Theophile Gautier", Joanna Richardson
"The Party of Reform", David Sarasohn
"Pajinas Escojidas", Juan Ramon Jimenez
"Poesias Completas", Antonio Machado
"Fighting Bob LaFollette", Nancy Unger
"Judith Gautier", Joanna Richardson
"The New World Spanish English Dictionary"
"Night Games", Arthur Schnitzler
"Concise Oxford French Dictionary" (1934)
"Selected Poems and Reflections on the Art of Poetry", Jules Supervielle
"The Fantastic", Tzvetan Todorov
"Contact and Exchange in the Ancient World", Victor Mair
"Os Sertoes", Euclides da Cunha (illust. Alfredo Aquino)
"Oeuvres Completes", Charles Cros
"Gravitations", Jules Supervielle
"Calligrammes, Guillaume Apollinaire
"Khiva", B. Fabritsky
"Discourses and Selected Writings", Epictetus
"Rapsodies", Petrus Borel
"Kenneth Rexroth: A Checklist of his Published Writings", Hartzell and Zumwinkle
"In Praise of the Barbarians", Mike Davis
"Selected Essays", Samuel Butler
"Chants of the Church", Monks of Solesmes
"Grand Horizontal", Cora Pearl
"Man About Paris", Arsene Houssaye
Oblomov, Ivan Goncharov
Tao Te Ching, tr. Chad Hansen
Baudelaire, Jean-Paul Sartre
"Only a Woman", Francis Carco
"Horace", George Sand
"Cristina: Portrait of a Princess", Beth Archer Brombert
"The Naked Civil Servant", Quentin Crisp
"Venice", Frederic Lane
"The New American Poetry", Donald Allen
"Francis Carco": The Career of a Literary Bohemian", Seymour Weiner
"A Bird of Different Plumage: Cristina di Belgioso", Charles Neilson Gattey
"Best Short Stories", Guy de Maupassant
"Secret History of the Mongol Queens, Jack Weatherford
"At War", Flann O'Brien
"Norwegian Americans and the Politics of Dissent", Lowell Soike
"Princess Mathilde", Joanna Richardson
"Lafcadio Hearn's Japan", ed. Donald Richie
"Grandes Horizontales", Virginia Rounding
"Complete Poems", Li Ch'ing-Chao, tr. Kenneth Rexroth / Ling Chung
"The First Chinese Embassy in the West", J. D. Frodsham
"La France frénétique de 1830", Jean-Luc Steinmetz
"Courbet", Bruno Foucart
"Demons of the Night", ed. Jan Kessler
"Marco Polo: The Description of the World", tr. Moule and Pelliot
"Civil War Battle Flags of the Union Army", C. McKeever
"Courbet", Anthea Callen
"The Red River Trails, !820-1870", Gilman, Gilman and Stultz
"The Soo Line", Patrick Dorin
"Pages from the Goncourt Journals", Edmond and Jules Goncourt
"We are the Living", Erskine Caldwell
"Petrus Borel", Aristide Marie
"La Revolte des Canuts", Maurice Moissonnier
"Courbet", Sandra Pinto
"Selected Short Stories", Honore de Balzac
"The Cambridge History of Ancient China", Loewe, Shaughnessy, et al.
"La quete alchimique dans l'œuvre d'Aloysius Bertrand", Rejane Blanc
"Œuvres Complètes", Aloysius Bertrand
"The Consecration of the Writer, 1750-- 1830", Paul Benichou
"Poèmes en Prose", Francis Carco
"From Eternity to Here", Sean Carroll
"Obra Poetica", Vinicius de Moraes
Guillaume Apollinaire, ed. Rees, "Alcools"
Gerard de Nerval, "Journey to the Orient"
Andrey Platanov, "The Foundation Pit"
Robert Chandler, tr., "Russian Short Stories from Pushkin to Buida"
"French Socialists Before Marx", Pamela Pilbeam
"The Bog People", P. V. Glob
"The First Bohemian", Robert Baldick
"Petrus Borel", Enid Starkie
"Les petits romantiques francais", Francis Dumont (ed.)
"Bohemian Paris", Jerrold Siegel
"La Maison du docteur Blanche", Laure Murat
"La Metaphysique du Mou", Jean-Baptiste Botul
"The Rise and Repression of Radical Labor", Daniel R. Fusfeld
"Les Filles de Feu / Les Chimères", Gerard de Nerval
"Musorgsky" David Brown
"The Bohemians", Joanna Richardson
"The Proletarian Philosophers", Jonathan Ree
"La Boheme", Puccini (Opera CD)
"Le Keepsake Fantastique", Aloysius Bertrand, ed. Guegan
"The Yuezhi", Craig Benjamin
"The Dwarf", Pär Lagerkvist
"The Poems in Prose", Baudelaire, tr. Scarfe
"Gracias y Desgracias del Ojo del Culo", Quevedo
"Mozart and Salieri (CD), Rimsky-Korsakoff (Pushkin libretto)
"The Legend of the Latin Quarter", A. Moss and E. Marvel
"Imagined Corners" (life of Ortelius), Paul Binding
and Ireland
Presumably only Ulster?
Nope, the whole goddamn thing. But he’s Catholic, so the Irish will be happy.
Behead him now and get it over with.
No! No! No! Properly speaking he is King of Bavaria, if you take the claim seriously. Although Herzog von Bayern does mean Duke of Bavaria, it’s nevertheless only his name not a title.
On the advice of Tiny Hermaphrodite, I have corrected the caption. A lot rides on this, the British Crown for example, so they better be right.
Is Bavaria a kingdom or a Duchy?
I’m not going to argue with Tiny. Bavaria is a kingdom.
Per Wiki, it became a Kingdom when the Holy Roman Empire was dissolved by Napoleon and remained so until 1918 when it it became a Free State of Germany, which it remains.
Bavaria is not a kingdom. The elevation of Bavaria to a kingdom was simply a matter of Napoleon’s will. And Napoleon had no right to make kingdoms, except that he had militarily conquered the other major powers of the time. The Wittelsbachs have an excellent claim to be Dukes of Bavaria as their ancient and hereditary title if we follow the principle that “the oldest is the best”. If we follow the principle that “might makes right (i.e., Napoleon’s army makes it right)”, then there’s really no such thing as a hereditary monarchy anyway. You can’t simultaneously claim to be a hereditary ruler (i.e. I should rule Bavaria because my family has ruled Bavaria for a long time) and use a title given to you by a military dictator (Napoleon).
I’m willing to let Burritoboy and Tiny fight it out. What Bavaria is now is a Free State, as I understand. It seems to have remained a Kingdom after the defeat of Napoleon and after Bavaria joined the North German Union until the end of WWI. In 1918 Ludwig III abdicated, but there seems to be uncertainty as to whether this was a personal abdication or the dissolution of the monarchy itself. The Wittelsbachs apparently don’t assert their claim but haven’t renounced it either.
As far as the theoretical question of whether a monarchy can be founded by a military dictator, the fact seems to be that it can be, given that the Bavarian Kingdom survived for a century. Might makes right seems to be the main method of founding hereditary monarchies, though Napoleon’s delegation of monarchy seems a bit odd.
“As far as the theoretical question of whether a monarchy can be founded by a military dictator, the fact seems to be that it can be, given that the Bavarian Kingdom survived for a century.”
All that sentence asserts is: “whatever is, is legal”.
That’s not a plausible argument for a hereditary ruler, because that would mean that any usurper (literally anybody) could take over the throne and the rightful heir would not have a claim.
Well, in actual fact legitimate claims not backed by force and diplomatic support are null. The Wittelsbachs themselves do not claim either the Bavarian or the British crown any more. Even a hereditary ruler who holds the throne only holds it as long as he can defend it. A weak ruler is a non-ruler. Various philosophers (Lao Tzu and Heraclitus for example) have pointed out that legitimacy is grounded on usurpation. Founders can’t be legitimate or they wouldn’t be founders. And it would nice to put a seal on the process and prohibit future foundings, in fact all founders do that, but these seals need to be defended too.
“Founders can’t be legitimate or they wouldn’t be founders. And it would nice to put a seal on the process and prohibit future foundings, in fact all founders do that, but these seals need to be defended too.”
You do realize this position is close to that of Carl Schmitt’s politics of the exception?
yeah, but Schmitt seems to have had a lot more enthusiasm for exceptions than I do. In fact, he seemed to believe in a permanent exception.
Historically, it now seems to me that Strauss in America was the entering wedge of Schmitt. Bush had someone whispering in his ear, perhaps young Kristol.
As for the legitimacy of the kingship of the Wittelsbachs, well it seems to me that the surrounding nations and especially the four great powers (Austria, England, Prussia, Russia) did recognize the claim for kingship and didn’t try to undo it when they had the chance at the Congress of Vienna.
I tend toward nominalism and relativism anyway, and the legitimacy of dynasties is one of the things about which I am most relativistic. “Legitimacy” strikes me as a useful fiction or default assumption which can get you over the small bumps but which shouldn’t be expected to do heavy work. It didn’t prevent the Civil War, and I don’t think that it should have been expected to because there was too much at stake.
Constitutionalism is much the same.
😎
Is he King Franz? I’m assuming he’s descended from the Stuart sister of Charles I, as are the Hanover lot. But why no Wales? Did he pursue Wales, like a latter day Captain Ahab, or did he trade it for somewhere else?
One day Britain will be ruled by goats. It was foreseen in the Bible*.
*(I think)
Franz is the Jacobite claimant, the King Over the Water. He’s not separately King of Wales for the same reason that the Welsh flag isn’t in the Union Flag and the Welsh coat of arms isn’t in the British coat of arms: the Principality of Wales is embraced within the Kingdom of England and is represented as such.
Okay, if you’re so smart, perhaps you can tell me why he has no upper lip. And I really doubt he’s the number one Jacobite. He’s more likely A Jacobite claimant.
It’s normal for royalty to be deformed because of the inbreeding. The Jacobites are much luckier than the Habsburgs.
Franz’s chin is quite long. Though not yet absurdly so, I’m still not sure I’d use him to breed from. Besides, I just can’t see him moving to Whales.
If you look at Otto von Hapsburg, you can see they’ve finally got their chins under control now it’s too late. He’s 98! His full name is Franz Joseph Otto Robert Maria Anton Karl Max Heinrich Sixtus Xavier Felix Renatus Ludwig Gaetan Pius Ignatius von H. Notice the “Karl Max” in the middle? It’s pretty clearly no coincidence.
It doesn’t appear that there are any Jacobite splinter groups supporting a rival claimant. The Jacobite claimants were still regarded as royalty in Catholic Europe and their lineage (at least the legitimate portion) is quite well documented.
Two further questions:
1) Did the Jacobites ever renounce the English claim to the French crown?
2) What do you call the kind of jacket he’s wearing? I’ve never seen one that looks like that before.
Obviously these questions will be answered in blood and iron. Except for the one about the jacket, I mean.
God save Queen Elizabeth II, for the United Kingdom! and God save King Franz… only for Bavaria!
I dont know why you are talking about him as is was homeless and he should had never become the king. i hate the royals and i will be happy the day we stop talking about them What do they really do for us.